Does Amazon Owe Wikipedia For Taking Advantage of The Free Labor of Their Volunteers?
Joined: Oct 24 2009
Last Active: Never/Not tracked
Total Active: Never/Not tracked
Timezone: GMT+ -7
Last Page Viewed:
October 11 '18 at 06:11 PM
By BeauHD from
Slashdot's nothing-is-free department
Slate's Rachel Withers argues that "tech companies that profit from Wikipedia's extensive database owe Wikimedia a much greater debt." Amazon's Alexa, for example, uses Wikipedia "without credit, contribution, or compensation." The Google Assistant also sources Wikipedia, but they credit the encyclopedia -- and other sites -- when it uses it as a resource. From the report: Amazon recently donated $1 million to the Wikimedia Endowment, a fund that keeps Wikipedia running, as "part of Amazon's and CEO Jeff Bezos' growing work in philanthropy," according to CNET. It's being framed as a "gift," one that -- as Amazon puts it -- recognizes their shared vision to "make it easier to share knowledge globally." Obviously, and as alluded to by CNET, $1 million is hardly a magnanimous donation from Amazon and Bezos, the former a trillion-dollar company and the latter a man with a net worth of more than $160 billion. But it's not just the fact that this donation is, in the scheme of things, paltry. It's that this "endowment" is dwarfed by what Amazon and its ilk get out of Wikipedia -- figuratively and literally. Wikipedia provides the intelligence behind many of Alexa's most useful skills, its answers to everything from "What is Wikipedia?" to "What is Slate?" (meta).
article continued at Slashdot's nothing-is-free department
Forgot name or password?
Click here to get them
Not a member?
Click here to join
: Large flux of old-but-been-broken news stories coming through.
: Need that for all dialogue in all things ever. Gone with the Wind: Gilbert Gottfried version
: Dream do come true. Gilbert Gottfried https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3H3xQzQauyY