A Third of Wikipedia Discussions Are Stuck in Forever Beefs
Joined: Oct 24 2009
Last Active: Never/Not tracked
Total Active: Never/Not tracked
Timezone: GMT+ -7
Last Page Viewed:
November 08 '18 at 10:30 AM
By msmash from
Slashdot's no-agreement-in-sight department
An anonymous reader shares a report: Wikipedia, the internet's encyclopedia, is run entirely by volunteers -- people who spend large swaths of their personal time making sure the information that hundreds of millions of people access every day stays accurate and up-to-date. Of those volunteers, 77 percent of Wikipedia articles are written by just one percent of Wikipedia editors. As such, tensions tend to get a little high, because these editors are often highly invested. They've been arguing about corn for nearly a decade, for example, and there's a long-running edit war about the meaning of neuroticism. When editors disagree about an edit to be made on a Wikipedia article, they start by discussing it on the article's Talk page. When that doesn't result in a decision, they can open a Request for Comment (RfC). From there, any editor can choose a side or discuss the merits of whatever edit is up for discussion, and -- in theory -- come to an agreement. Or at least, some kind of decision about how to make the edit. But a new study by MIT researchers found that as many as one-third of RfC disputes go unresolved, often abandoned out of frustration or exhaustion. The most common sticking points were chalked up to inexperience, inattention from experience editors, and just plain petty bickering.
Forgot name or password?
Click here to get them
Not a member?
Click here to join
: Large flux of old-but-been-broken news stories coming through.
: Need that for all dialogue in all things ever. Gone with the Wind: Gilbert Gottfried version
: Dream do come true. Gilbert Gottfried https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3H3xQzQauyY