By timothy from Slashdot's why-you-can't-take-analysts-seriously department
dcblogs writes "Gartner says new technologies are decreasing jobs. In the industrial revolution — and revolutions since — there was an invigoration of jobs. For instance, assembly lines for cars led to a vast infrastructure that could support mass production giving rise to everything from car dealers to road building and utility expansion into new suburban areas. But the "digital industrial revolution" is not following the same path. "What we're seeing is a decline in the overall number of people required to do a job," said Daryl Plummer, a Gartner analyst at the research firm's Symposium ITxpo. Plummer points to a company like Kodak, which once employed 130,000, versus Instagram's 13. The analyst believes social unrest movements, similar to Occupy Wall Street, will emerge again by 2014 as the job creation problem deepens."
Isn't "decline in the overall number of people required to do a job" precisely
what assembly lines effect, even if some job categories as a result require fewer humans
? We recently posted a contrary analysis arguing that the Luddites are wrong
.Read Replies (0)
By Unknown Lamer from Slashdot's jay-sherman-presents department